Austria's furniture industry is facing an unprecedented wave of regulation. Four major EU rules, the Digital Product Passport (DPP), the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR), the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) and the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), are coming into force simultaneously. Their aim is to increase transparency and sustainability along the entire value chain. In practice, however, they currently create a significant administrative burden without providing the intended protection for European manufacturers.
© LinkedIn
A Surge in Regulation Without Real Protective Effect
The new EU regulations impose far-reaching documentation and reporting duties on furniture producers. Each product must be backed by detailed information on materials, processes, suppliers, origin and environmental impact. While the goal — strengthening sustainable production over cheap imports — is sound in principle, the protective mechanism is barely functioning in reality.
Heavy Burden on Domestic Manufacturers
Even before the planned control systems are operational, companies must make substantial investments in data collection, IT upgrades and internal compliance procedures. Technologies intended to support enforcement — such as satellite monitoring, geo-tracking or origin databases — are still under development. Many member states currently lack the infrastructure needed to enforce the rules consistently.
The result: compliance costs rise immediately, while oversight of competitors remains weak.
Insufficient and Patchy Controls
According to current EU planning, only around 9% of imports from high-risk countries will be subject to random checks. This means that nine out of ten shipments enter the EU single market without any inspection. Even when controls take place, origin evidence can still be bypassed relatively easily through intermediaries, mixed batches or falsified documents.
Online Marketplaces as a Major Loophole
Platforms such as Temu, Shein or Alibaba currently do not count as "placing goods on the market" and therefore are not liable for the products sold through them. As a result, countless small parcels can be shipped directly to consumers — bypassing customs checks, origin verification and sustainability requirements entirely.
Distortion of Competition Within the Single Market
While European manufacturers must disclose their full value chains, low-cost imports and fast-furniture goods continue to enter the market with little resistance. This creates a significant competitive disadvantage for companies that invest in sustainable production, quality and transparency.
Low Risk for Non-Compliant Actors
Even when violations are detected, consequences are often limited to warnings or administrative fines. Effective import bans are rare. With fragmented market surveillance across member states, enforcement remains weak and loopholes remain large.
Conclusion
The bureaucratic burden hits compliant producers first, while fast-furniture imports continue to flow almost unhindered. As long as digital control systems, satellite-based monitoring and binding liability rules for online marketplaces remain incomplete, the EU creates more burden than steering — and the goal of a fair, circular furniture economy drifts further out of reach.
